Source: University of Sheffield
While studying feminist theory, my tutor encouraged me to attend an event with Philosopher Miranda Fricker from the University of Sheffield. Dr. Fricker talked about blame. I was a little out of my league with this discussion, but I think I got the gist of the talk.
One of the points that struck me were aspects of appropriate blame. She outlined several aspects such as "expectations should be reasonable", and "strength of blame must be proportional to fault". I find these parameters logical, but when I'm upset with someone, there is very little logic involved--I'm wrapped up in emotion. One thing I learned this term is the importance of awareness, but I get frustrated (speaking of emotion) because I like things to move fast and awareness seems like a slow part of the process of change.
I do agree with Fricker that blame can be constructive when asserted properly, but I disagree that appropriate blame is entirely possible because of the emotions involved especially in the heat of the moment. When I'm driving, especially when I'm alone, I yell at the other drivers who do dumb things. I blame them for not using a turn signal, not going any where close the speed limit, and for cutting me off among other sins. Is my blame appropriate? Probably not, but is it still inappropriate if i'm the only one that knows I'm blaming them - I'm not one to use the horn or get out of my car and yell at someone. Is the ultimate goal to get to a point where I'm not yelling at the person in front of me?
Bibliography
Fricker, Miranda "What's the Point of Blame?" February 2013
"Miranda Fricker" University of Sheffield Department of Philosophy. http://www.shef.ac.uk/philosophy/prospectivepostgraduates/rtm
No comments:
Post a Comment